Thursday, August 30, 2012

In Quest of the White Mountain Fritillary

One of North America’s rarest and least known butterflies, the White Mountain Fritillary (Boloria montinus) makes it living exclusively at or above treeline on the Presidential Range of New Hampshire’s White Mountains.  Isolated from its holarctic cousins for at least the past several thousand years, this 'endemic' butterfly’s extremely narrow range and unknown population size led to its 2008 listing as a state-endangered species.  It is also a prime candidate for conservation monitoring, which is where VCE enters the picture.  VCE biologists Brendan Collins and Spencer Hardy made weekly trips throughout July and August to Mt. Washington's famed alpine meadows and stunted krummholz forests, with the goal of elucidating this subspecies’ ecology and life history.  The duo logged many rugged miles (and took in countless breathtaking views) to survey fritillaries and their habitat at more than 100 point count locations, which were concentrated around moist alpine snowbank communities.  They devoted special attention to documenting possible host plants, the discovery of which proved to be even more elusive than the butterflies themselves.
 
The first flight of adult White Mountain Fritillaries began during the second week of July, and numbers peaked on 10 August, when Brendan and Spencer detected individuals at 24 of 26 survey points.  VCE's hard-won data promise to yield more accurate population estimates and a refined understanding of how this rare alpine specialist is distributed within its tiny White Mountain range.  We'll be back at it in 2013, when we will confirm the fritillary's host plants(s)!
 
VCE discovered several other butterfly species in Mt. Washington's alpine zone this summer, including a number of “hill topping” species.  Our list included Pink-edged Sulphur, Painted and American Ladies, Monarch, Gray Commas, Mourning Cloak, Red Admiral, and Milbert's Tortoiseshell, among others.
 
Photo courtesy of K.P. McFarland

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Killer Cats- A Conservation Concern


Turning into my driveway last night, I caught a glint of yellow eyes and a flash of white fur.  Hitting the brakes just in time, I realized that my neighbor’s cat was out again- and on the hunt.  She crouched at the side of the driveway, back hunched protectively, paws on the ground in front of her. As I got out of the car and approached, distracting the cat, a small, dark creature wriggled free from her grip and hobbled towards the safety of the lawn.  “Oh no,” I groaned. Our local domesticated predator had struck again.

Many people wonder what they can do for conservation and how they can make a real difference both in their community and globally. One fairly substantial answer:  keep your cats indoors.  While cats may look sweet and harmless, they are natural predators, and the ancestors of domestic cats (and feral cats today) hunted rodents, birds, reptiles, and other small wildlife to survive. Pouncing is an instinct for cats, and when young cats “play with their food” they may be honing their hunting skills- learning to time their strikes based on the movement and distance of the prey item, coordinating their movements to successfully capture their target.

 
Most cat owners whose cats roam free have come home to find limp and lifeless “gifts” on their doorstep, or have observed their cat sneaking up a tree in which a bird’s nest hides in the crook of a branch.  But we usually only observe our cats killing a few birds or mice- how much of an impact can this really have on wildlife populations?

The answer is- plenty. One 2011 study by Anne Balogh, Thomas Ryder, and Pete Marra showed that in Washington, D.C., predation accounted for 79% of all Gray Catbird deaths, and almost half of the observed predation was attributable to domestic cats. A 2003 study by Michael Woods, Robbie McDonald, and Stephen Harris in Great Britain estimated that over a period of 5 months, domesticated British cats brought home between 85-100 million prey items, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. In southeastern Michigan, a 2003 study calculated that during the breeding season, free-ranging cats killed a minimum of one bird per kilometer per day, for a total of ~16,000-~47,000 birds killed over the course of the breeding season in this area.
 
However, the number of wildlife kills by cats is hard to study, and much past research has relied on reports from cat owners.  A new, innovative study attached “Kitty Cams” to 60 cats in Georgia to record the cats’ behavior, day and night.  The results were alarming.  Although much of the scientific literature focuses on the impacts of outdoor cats on bird populations, the Kitty Cams showed that among these cats, 41% of prey items are reptiles, with mammals comprising 25% and birds 12%.  These clever cameras also suggest that owner reports of cat kills are drastically underrepresenting the impact of predation; only about a quarter of prey was brought home by these cats, with almost half left to rot.

Many of us are familiar with the devastating effects that invasive species can have on single species and entire ecosystems; in fact, NatureServe identifies invasive species as the second biggest threat to endangered species, second only to habitat loss.  European gypsy moths caused hundreds of millions of dollars of destruction in eastern U.S. forests, feral hogs have devastated local plant communities in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, and the chestnut blight fungus of the late 19th century wiped out almost every single chestnut tree in the eastern U.S.  Domestic cats, too, are an invasive species, and most wildlife communities are not adapted to avoid these skilled predators.

So, if you’d like to play a more active role in conservation in your community, consider keeping your cats indoors.  Your cats will live longer, and your local wildlife community will thank you.

For more information about the Kitty Cam research, and to watch Kitty Cam videos, see:


For additional information on domestic cats’ impact on wildlife, go to:


For an opinion piece on how keeping cats outdoors is bad for both wildlife and the cats themselves, check out:

Monday, August 06, 2012

Loon Occupancy on a 16-acre Pond - in detail

The ideal nesting lake for loons is over 80 acres in size.  Loons will nest on smaller ponds, but one bird will begin flying off to nearby waters while the mate tends to the nest or chicks.  In some cases, loons will actually defend multiple lakes.  However, small ponds are still important for loons even if there is no territorial pair.  These smaller waters provide a safe spot for non-breeding loons to spend time feeding, preening, and resting.  In some years, we might actually see some pair-like activity, but it may be temporary.  But how do loons really utilized a tiny pond?  Diane Walker documented the comings and goings of loons on Collins Pond (16 acres) in 2011 almost daily.

Aug. 1:   1 loon all day
Aug.2:   2 loons 5:30-6:30 am, 1 loon rest of day, 2 loons 8:15 pm
Aug. 3:  1 loon till 7:00am, no loons rest of day
Aug. 4:  0 loons most of day, 3 loons flew in late afternoon, all left at 8:30 pm
Aug. 5:  1 loon arrives 7:00 pm
Aug. 6:  1 loon till 2:00 pm, 2 loons 2-3:45 pm, 1 flew off 4 pm, 2nd loon flew back 8:00 pm.
and so on.

Loon activity on Collins Pond in August 2011 can be summarized as follows. 
No loons at all: 8 days (only once were there 2 days in a row with no loons).

0 or 1 loon for part of day: 5 days
0 or 2 loons for part of day: 2 days
1 loon all day: 6 days
1 or 2 loons all day: 6 days (often 2nd loon would only be present for 1-3 hours)
3 loons at once for short time:  2 days

Collins Pond is located close to Green River Reservoir where there are now 3 territorial loon pairs, and the Zack Woods Pond loon pair is also nearby (about 35 acres when connected Perch P. is added).  It is very likely that the loons from Zack Woods Pond utilize Collins Pond to some extent but we do not know how frequently.  Collins Pond's maximum depth is 20 feet and Zack Woods is 55 feet.  Deep small ponds likely provide better loon habitat than a 16 acre pond that is only a few feet deep.  Although waters like Collins Pond may never be a loon nesting pond, they're obviously important for a healthy loon population.  Thank you Diane for keeping notes at this level of detail.